Amid Prince Harry and Meghan Markle‘s decision to step back from the royal family, several questions have been posed by royal fans. Perhaps one of the biggest questions has been whether Harry is still in line to the throne.
Although the assumption has been that he will remain in the line of succession despite leaving his royal duties behind, the couple directly answered the question in an announcement on Wednesday.
“As the grandson of Her Majesty and second son of The Prince of Wales, Prince Harry remains sixth in the line of succession, and The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s status in the Order of Precedence is unchanged,” a spokesperson for the couple said.
They also clarified the use of their titles going forward.
“The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will formally retain their ‘HRH’ styles, but they will not actively use them. They will continue to be known as The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, as well as by their titles of The Earl and Countess of Dumbarton and The Baron and Baroness Kilkeel,” the statement continued.
RELATED: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Just Revealed Major New Details About Their Royal Exit
The agreement reached between the Queen and the couple last month will be put into effect starting March 31. Starting April 1, Harry and Meghan will no longer hold an office at Buckingham Palace and will instead be represented by their U.K. charity foundation team.
“The Duke and Duchess will be spending their time in both the United Kingdom and North America,” the spokesperson adds. “In addition to continuing to work closely with their existing patronages as they build a plan for engagements in the U.K. and the Commonwealth throughout the year, The Duke and Duchess have also been undertaking meetings as part of their ongoing work to establish a new non-profit organization. The details of this new organization will be shared later in the year.
RELATED: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry in ‘Ongoing Discussions’ About Whether They Will Use the Word ‘Royal’
“In general, the themes of their cause related work will remain unchanged, which includes the Commonwealth, community, youth empowerment and mental health, collectively.”
A review is still set to follow after 12 months, at which point the royal family will revisit the agreement.
“As there is no precedent for this new model of working and eventual financial independence, the Royal Family and The Sussexes have agreed to an initial 12-month review to ensure the arrangement works for all parties,” the spokesperson says.
Can’t get enough of PEOPLE‘s Royals coverage? Sign up for our free Royals newsletter to get the latest updates on Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and more!
“As The Duke and Duchess are stepping back as senior Members of the Royal Family, and will work towards financial independence, use of the word ‘Royal’, in this context, needed to be reviewed. Discussions are still ongoing, however, a change will be announced alongside the launch of their new non-profit organization,” their spokesperson says.
While the discussions continue, it reportedly appears likely that they will not use the word “royal.”
Phillip: First of all why was he released? I get it that trump has the right to put who he wants in what ever positions, but why was he asked to resign? What was he not doing that trump feels someone else needs to do better? With that said lets look at this quote: He later told reporters that, “In the weeks after signing the certification I did become aware that the aid had been held. I never received a very clear explanation other than there were concerns about corruption in Ukraine.” So if we are not sure what exact corruption was being concerned about, why was the money released? Again what changed from the time that Trump put the money on hold, to the time he released what corruption was confirmed? Was it ever confirmed? If we have a sign off for the money saying they met all standards to receive, what info, what whistleblower, what anything came out to justify the hold?